A
spokeswoman for the Washington headquarters of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) says the drawing of weapons in the ramp inspection of
an aircraft in Long Beach, Calif., last month was justified but not
"normal." Kelly Ivahnenko also told AVweb
that general aviation pilots can expect more ramp checks by CBP agents
thanks to the newly-instituted Electronic Advance Passenger Information
System (eAPIS). She stressed it's unlikely many of the checks will have
the level of intensity employed May 22 with Long Beach, Calif., pilot
David Perry and his three passengers. Ivahnenko said in an interview on
Tuesday that there was a "heightened alert" involved in the Long Beach
operation but she also said she could not discuss the circumstances
that led to a more aggressive posture than normal by the CBP and local
police. She also said that while eAPIS had nothing to do with the Long
Beach inspection, information provided through eAPIS could result in
more frequent GA inspections. The system, which involves the online
filing of flight and passenger information for transborder flights,
became mandatory on May 18. In an interview
and podcast
with AVweb,
Perry said he and his passengers were put in unnecessary peril by
gun-wielding enforcement officials. Ivahnenko stressed Perry's
experience is not what most pilots should expect if they're checked by
the CBP. "This I would not classify as common or routine," she said.
She said the Long Beach action was justified, even though the search
turned up nothing illegal. "While the involvement of more than one law
enforcement agency and the heightened alert of the situation were
slightly unusual, it is within (CBP's) authority to inspect inbound and
outbound travelers, vehicles, planes, cargo, etc.," she told AVweb.
She also said that only the Long Beach police officers
assisting the operation actually drew weapons and CBP agents kept
theirs holstered, something Perry vehemently disputes. "Every one of
them had their weapons out," Perry said.
Perry also said that while most of those who surrounded his
airplane carried pistols, he saw at least one assault rifle carried by
a CBP agent. Ivahnenko said the CBP agents involved are not equipped
with assault rifles and the tactical team that does carry them was not
in Long Beach that day. Perry adamantly disagrees with Ivahnenko
regarding the presence of assault rifles. While Ivahnenko maintains CBP
agents did not draw weapons, she said it was their idea that the Long
Beach police officers have their guns out. "We are taking
responsibility as the lead agency who requested assistance from Long
Beach," she said. "That was simply part of the security protocol for
that part of the inspection." Perry said he and his passengers were
ordered at gunpoint to first put their hands on their heads and then
get out of the airplane one by one. They were individually questioned
and they and the contents of the plane were searched. Perry said he's
considering filing a civil rights action against the CBP and has been
told by an attorney that the search may have violated the 4th Amendment
of the Constitution that limits search and seizure powers of the
government. Ivahnenko said the controversy stirred by the Long Beach
inspection may prompt an outreach campaign by the CBP to address
concerns being expressed by the general aviation community about the
new border-crossing rules.