#150 how disinformation feeds cognitive dissonance

RedshiftDrift2023-09-19, edited 2023-09-22OpenGeneral

Ethan Siegel’s disinformation is also noticed by Stacy McGaugh.

Comment on “Triton Station”, Stacy McGaugh’s blog

[Apass] September 14, 2023 at 2:56 pm And the sad part is that Ethan Siegel will cite only that paper [arXiv:2309.05252] and not also your answer and will not point that is also problematic for LCDM. And that will strengthen the public opinion about MoND = bad, LCDM = good.

[tritonstation] September 15, 2023 at 3:47 pm Yep. That’s how disinformation feeds cognitive dissonance.

https://tritonstation.com/2023/09/08/is-the-milky-ways-rotation-curve-declining/

Comments (3)

bgreenman2023-09-21, edited 2023-09-21

The reason MoND is not taken seriously by researchers is that most researchers have invested their energy and time on working with LCDM

sahil5d2023-09-21, edited 2023-09-21

Another, smaller reason is that the name is dissonant. They should rebrand as Milgrommatic gravity or M gravity imo.

bgreenman2023-09-22, edited 2023-09-22

Thats a great idea