Expanding universe proponents often cite the size of the Milky Way relative to more distant ones. Well…
https://phys.org/news/2023-09-revisited-mass-milky-smaller-cosmology.html
The total mass of the Milky Way is estimated to be only two hundred billion times that of the sun (2.06 x 1011 solar masses), marking a significant downward revision—approximately four to five times lower than previous estimates.
The result shows that the cold dark matter concept isn’t as viable as mainstream theorists thought
The mass of the Milky Way is not as important as the rotation curve of the Milky Way reported by the paper. A Keplerian rotation curve means, for some astronomers, no “dark matter”.
Correct idea
It’s hard to know what to make of this given it’s just a press release. For a nuanced discussion of the Gaia data see McGaugh’s recent treatment which doesn’t seem to find any significant mass discrepancy nor a Keplerian decline.
The original paper is on arXiv
Problem is we are still trying to figure out the level of rotation curves and degree of mass discrepancies